In recent years, the “high risk” problems encountered by Google developers in the process of listing new accounts and new applications have been particularly prominent. With the continuous upgrading of technical means, traditional anti-association and high-risk avoidance strategies have gradually become ineffective. The solutions based on static rules in the past are no longer applicable, and the current review mechanism is dynamically changing.
As of the beginning of 2025, the success rate of new accounts and new applications has not reached 100%. Even with the same ideas and solutions, some applications can be successfully listed and run stably, while others are marked as “high risk” within 1-3 days after submission for review. Although the resources and strategies are basically the same, the success rate is not as stable as expected.
In response to this phenomenon, we conducted an in-depth traceability analysis, compared successful and failed application cases, locked in key issues, and optimized details.
Key findings and optimization measures
Dynamic review mechanism: Google’s review mechanism has shifted from static rules to dynamic evaluation, which is difficult to deal with by traditional methods.
Differentiated treatment: Even under the same solution, the performance of different applications is significantly different, and targeted optimization is required.
Internal optimization: By comparing successful and failed cases, we found the key factors that affect the audit results and made corresponding adjustments. Currently, these optimization measures are only available to internal subscribers, and the remaining content can be read for a fee on the website ggplay.net.
Full text link: The latest ideas for listing on Google Play, why some software packages are successfully listed, while others are directly judged as high risk?
Comments0